|
LEGAL EXPLANATIONS REGARDING
THE REGULATION OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
Introduction
The Electronic Signature in the Republic
of Slovenia is regulated by the Electronic Commerce and Electronic
Signature Act /ECESA/ (Official Gazette of the Republic of
Slovenia, No. 57/2000) and the Decree on Conditions for Electronic
Commerce and Electronic Signing (Official Gazette of the Republic
of Slovenia, No. 77/2000 and 2/2001). In March 2004 the Act was amended, and the result is the Official consolidated text of the Act on electronic commerce and electronic signature. The main significance
of the Act is that under
special conditions it extends the same validity to the electronic
signature as the autographic signature has in the paper world.
The Decree defines in detail individual conditions from the
Act. The Act is entirely in accordance with the provisions
of the United Nations’ Commission or the International
Trade Law’s (UNCITRAL) Model Law of the electronic commerce
and with the provisions of the primary European legislation.
It also includes all the provisions of the Directive 1999/93/EC
of the European parliament and EU Council from 13. December
1999 concerning common framework of the Community for electronic
signatures.
Principles
The
Act on electronic commerce and electronic signature is based
on modern principles: the principle of the non-discrimination
of the electronic form, the principle of openness, the principle
of contractual freedom of the parties, the principle of duality,
the principle of protection of personal data and protection of the consumers
and the principle of international recognition.
The
principle of non-discrimination of the electronic form means,
that the paper form and the electronic form are reasonably equivalent,
thus the courts and state institutions during the examination
of the evidence can not refuse the evidence solely on the grounds of its electronic form.
The
principle of openness or technological neutrality ensures, that
the Act does not refer only to one kind of technology or just
to current solutions, but it remains general and thus useful
for a longer time period and new technologies. Along with the
fast and various technological development goes also the principle
of duality, which allows the use of different technological
solutions with different reliability and thus different legal
consequences of the use of such solutions.
The
principle of contractual freedom of the parties enables the
parties to agree and regulate their relationships differently.
Therefore the Act explicitly states that it is not valid for
closed systems, where parties regulate all essential characteristics
of the system in advance by a contract. Thus contractual parties
in the closed systems are not bound solely by the solutions
foreseen by law regarding electronic commerce.
Because
of technological complexity of the solutions for the electronic
commerce, also the principle of the protection of personal information
and protection of the consumers are important. The principle
of the protection of personal data follows modern guidelines,
established in Slovenia and European Union concerning the safe-keeping
of personal information which are even more exposed in the electronic
world. The principle of the protection of the consumers protects
an average consumer, for whom - without a lot of technological
knowledge - is more difficult to implement his rights in the
complicated electronic commerce, and imposes to the service-providers
a special care for the consumer.
The
principle of international recognition enables a simple mutual
recognition of the electronic documents and signatures and thus
enables a simple integration of the Slovenian economy into the
international economy. International recognition of the legal
effect of the data and signatures in an electronic form is very
important, because the electronic commerce does not take
into account the state borders or borders between individual
legal systems.
Electronic signature
In its third chapter the Act
more extensively regulates the electronic signature and the
operation of the certification service providers, who represent
an inevitable condition for the use of the electronic signatures.
The Act is entirely relying on the European and world orientations
and uses a so-called dual approach. Namely, it allows the operation
of the certification service providers without previous permission
and also does not imply special conditions for their operation,
but it enables the operation of the certification service providers
under very various conditions providing of different services
of verification, which gives them different legal effect regarding
their reliability. One of provisions as stated in the act is
obligatory and voluntary supervision. The former is performed
by an appropriate inspection and the latter by the Agency for
telecommunications.
The Act defines the electronic
signature very broadly and in general as data in electronic
form, which are included or logically linked with other data.
Furthermore, it is designed to verify the authenticity of the
data and the identification of the signatory. Similarly as the
EU directive, the Act also states that the electronic signature
is formed with the assistance of means for electronic signing
(e.g., private signing key) and verifies with means and data
for verifying the electronic signature.
Due to the fact that many clients,
who have not dealt with each other before, will meet in
an electronic environment, it is necessary to have a third party,
which by issuing a certificate will act as a trusted third party
in verifying the electronic signature of both parties. The certificate
links data for verifying the electronic signature with the holder
of the certificate and verifies the identity to the second party.
According to the Electronic Commerce
and Electronic Signature Act, any natural or legal person can
be a Certification Authority that issues certificates or performs
other services regarding certification or with electronic signatures.
The Certification Authority does not need any specific licence
for its operation. It only needs to register its activities
when it commences operation to the Ministry of the information
society, which manages a list of all Certification Authorities
in Slovenia. The Act institutes two types of supervision: inspectional,
which is performed by the Ministry of the information society,
and voluntary within the framework of an accreditation scheme,
which is performed by the newly established Agency for Telecommunications
in accordance with the new Telecommunications Act.
One of the important provisions
for users of the ECESA and the Decree in regarding electronic
signature is the obligation that all means and data for verifying
an electronic signature must be kept as long as the electronically
signed documents are stored.
Also persons, who store electronically
signed data, are obliged to, no later than one month prior to
the expiration date which is set by the Certification Authority
for the validity of data for electronic signature in the policy
of operations, ensure that all persons who initially electronically
signed the data must once again sign this data, this can also
be done by a notary or by verifying this data with a secure
time stamp of the Certification Authority. If the Certification
Authority did not set a deadline, a repeated signature is needed
before the expiration date of the qualified certificate at the
latest. It is important to note that the E-commerce and Electronic
Signature Act considers the use of data and means for
electronic signing without the knowledge of the signatory or
the certification holder a misdemeanor.
Secure electronic signature
and qualified certificate
The above-described electronic
signature with the certificate of the Certification Authority
does still not have the same
validity as the autographic signature. According to ECESA,
only a secure electronic signature, which is verified with a
qualified certificate,
is equal and therefore has equal validity and proving value
of an
autographic signature. A secure electronic signature is an electronic
signature, which meets a few enumerated requirements in the
Act. It must be exclusively linked to the signatory; this way
we can undoubtedly determine the signatory. Simultaneously,
the signature must be technologically designed so that it is
linked to the referred data. Any change of the data or connection
with them, which would happen after the signing, would be noticed.
The signatory must form the signature using one of the devices
for secure electronic signing and under its exclusive supervision.
Devices for secure electronic signing differ from general devices
for electronic signing. They comply with special conditions
regarding security and reliability, as defined in ECESA and
in more detail in the Decree. A secure electronic signature
must be verified with a qualified certificate. This kind of
certificate has the same characteristics as a general certificate
only that the law provides in detail its content, manner of
issue, use, and revocation. In the Act and the Decree we can
also find prescribed special, rigorous conditions regarding
Certification Authorities, who issue such qualified certificates
(compulsory liability insurance, special requirements regarding
equipment and employees, exacting procedures, internal regulations,
etc.).
|